Elegance & Simplicity and

Scale, Contrast & Proportion


(material from: Designing Visual Interfaces by Mullet and Sano)


"maximize meaning, minimize means" - Abram Games
 

Enhance communication by carefully selecting elements to be emphasized

Solve the problem completely, in a highly economical way
 
Here is a web page showing a wide assortment of US Road signs -
http://www.trafficsign.us/
 
Here are some other roadsigns .. but first lets try a quiz:
 http://www.channel4.com/4car/fun/quiz/2005/euro-signs/euro-signs.jsp

Europe: http://www.reidsguides.com/t_au/t_au_road_signs.html
and http://www.ideamerge.com/motoeuropa/roadsigns/

and http://www.elve.net/rcoulst.htm

and a good bad example: http://www.baddesigns.com/dontgo.html

and another good bad one, though this time its not the sign's fault (I've had similar experiences in Evanston):
http://www.baddesigns.com/streetsn.html

Elegant solutions reveal an intimate understanding of the problem and an ability to ensure that its essence is grasped by the consumer

minimization of component parts and simplification of relationships between the parts
 
 

Benefits of Simplicity:

3 Principles of Simplicity


 

Common Errors:



London Underground Map

Slightly different higher resolution version available at:
  http://www.oxfordtube.com/uploads/Underground_Map%5B1%5D.pdf

Compare this map of the CTA in downtown Chicago:
http://www.transitchicago.com/maps/maps/fwebmaptrain.gif

to this map of the CTA
http://www.transitchicago.com/maps/maps/2007C.html

Line Map


 

Techniques:


Reduction:

Reinforce the message by removing non-essential elements

  1. Determine the essential qualities (typically a short list of adjectives) that should be conveyed by the design, along with any fixed formal elements, such as a name or label, an essential control, or color, texture, pattern, or image.
  2. Critically examine each element in the design and ask yourself why it is needed, how it relates to the essence of the design (identified above), and how the design would fuffer without it. If you can't answer any of these questions, remove the element.
  3. Try to remove the element from the design anyway. What happens? If the design collapses, either functionally or aesthetically, the element must be replaced. Otherwise, consider omitting it from the final solution.

    Department of Transportation Icons
typical icons inside an airport

here are a bunch more:
http://www.aiga.org/content.cfm/symbol-signs


Regularizing:

 

Establishing a pattern simplifies the design by moving the viewer's experience to a higher level of abstraction.

Reduce information by repeating elements according to a discernable rule, principle, or rhythm

Reduce visual complexity and enhance structure and predictability

Align or reflect elements along common axis
Standardizing or repeating sizes and spacing
Reducing components to basic geometric forms

Any irregularity will be interpreted as significant by the user who will cheerfully ascribe it to a meaning even where none was intended. By regularizing non-critical elements throughout the work, you can attract the user's attention by reliably introducing an obvious irregularity whenever you do wish to make a distinction.

Use of regular geometric forms, simplified contours, and muted colors wherever possibleIf multiple similar forms are required, make them identifcal, if possible,in size, shape, color, texture, lineweight, orientation, alignment, or spacing. Limit variation in typography to a few sizes from one or two familiesTo reap the benefits of regularity, make sure critical elements intended to stand out in the display are not regularized


Leverage:

    good example is the header for a window

  1. Review the functional role played by each element in the design. (This information should be a natural product of the reduction phase.)
  2. Look for situations where multiple elements are filling (or partially filling) the same role
  3. Question whether an element's role could be filled as well by an adjacent component, possibly after minor modifications.
  4. Combine redundant elements into a single, simpler unit or replace the lot with a common higher-level idiom from the target environment designed to address the situation.


Too much leverage can be bad - 70s LED watch with multiple functions controlled by 2 small buttons: display time/date (the display was normally off to conserve battery power), switch into set time mode, switch into set date mode, increase the value of the time (or date)

http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/watches/725d/



Scale, Contrast & Proportion


 

(material from: Designing Visual Interfaces by Mullet and Sano)
 

Before we get to the lecture, lets talk about Project 1 some more in terms of button sizes. I'm passing around a printout of the group solutions to Project 1 at 1:1 scale (2" by 3") and another sheet showing various possible button sizes. Which button sizes / spacing do you think you could easily press with your fingers?

pdf file

need to achieve a balance in the relationsips between elements in the design

Scale - relative size or magnitude of a given design element in relation to other design elements - always relative

Contrast - noticeable differences along a common visual dimension (shape, size, color, position, orientation, movement)

Proportion - ratios of dimensions

Differentiation - contrast provides differentiation

Emphasis - scale and contrast are used to emphasize important elements of the design

Activity - scale and contrast move the viewer's eye through the composition in a predictable sequence

Interest - scale and contrast add visual interest
 

Visual contrasts established by manipulating perceptual qualities

the following are retinal variables - perceived immediately and effortlessly - fundamental units of visual communication

retinal variables

Information represented in a visual display is characterized by


Nominal
- User interested in categorizing


In ordered perception the viewer must determine the relative ordering of values along a perceptual dimension. Given any two visual elements, a natural ordering must be clearly apparent so the element representing 'more' of the corresponding quality is immediately obvious


In quantitative perception the viewer must determine the amount of difference between two ordered values. The user does not need to refer to an index or key - the relative magnitudes must be immediately apparent


Visual variables differ substantially in length:


Principles:


Common Errors:
 

Insufficient contrast
insufficient contrast

here is a nice real world example: http://www.baddesigns.com/speedo.html 

Excessive contrast

Excessive Contrast

Visual interference - it seems like a nice idea to show colours in the correct colour, or a font in its font, but these can make the text harder to read.

Visual Interference

Spatial tension


Awkward dimensions

awkward dimensions


Techniques:

 Establishing perceptual layers

  1. Group each item of information into a small number (7 +/- 2) of categories according to its origin or intended use. A group must be established for any group of items that will need to be processed independently. Each item must be assigned to at least one group.
  2. Determine the rank or importance of the various groups and organize them into an even smaller number (e.g. 3-5) of echelons based on this ranking
  3. Use appropriate perceptual variables to establish the layering effect. Size and value can establish clear perceptual hierarchies, while hue is most effective for non-hierarchical grouping
  4. Maximize the perceptual difference between groups while minimizing the difference within groups
  5. Use the squint test to ensure that elements in the same layer group together as a unit, but that group itself can be visually separated from the rest of the display

Sharpening visual distinctions

  1. Identify the ranking that need to be established across the groups of information (see layering)
  2. Determine the range of variation (e.g. minimum and maximum values or sized, number of colors, etc.) available and use as much of it as possible in the resulting code.
  3. Use logarithmic rather than linear scaling across the visible range to ensure the discriminability of contrasts at large absolute magnitudes. Doubling each successive level is usually sufficient.
  4. Use the squint test to ensure that at least the first two or three echelons can be easily recognized 'at a glance.'

Here are some real-world examples - a car title and a student ID:
http://www.baddesigns.com/numbers.html

Similarly in Illinois a car title has many numbers on it. VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NO, ODOMETER, TITLE NO and CONTROL NO. Which one of them is significantly larger than the others, sitting off on its own, and coloured in bright red as opposed to black for all the others? The CONTROL NO. The TITLE NO is buried amongst all the others. And we will just accept that 'NO' is a good abbreviation for number.

The UIC student ID has 3 long numbers on it (Univ ID#, Library #, and Card #). The Univ ID# is now coloured blue to make it stand out from the others. In contrast credit cards only have a single long number on the front. They want to make it easy to use so you use their card.

Integrating figure and ground

  1. Determine the overall size of the figure/ground combination. Note that desgins will usually require adjustment as the overall size is changed, since critical internal relationships are disrupted when a figure is scaled uniformly. 
  2. Equalize the visual weight of figure and ground. Use the squint test to check that neither the positive or negative space dominate.
  3. Provide enough space around the margins of the figure to eliminate unwarrented visual tension.
  4. Position the figure correctly within the ground. The figure should usually be centered within the ground unless communication requirements dictate otherwise. Use the squint test .



 

Think about how you present information on a resume - how you use whitespace (vertical and horizontal) to set apart the different sections, underlining and boldface to highlight certain words

Here is some informative text ... its all one paragraph, all the same font, the same font size:

ILLINOIS STATE FORECAST, NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE CHICAGO IL, 430 PM CST TUE MAR 23 1999 TONIGHT...CLEAR NORTH...CLEARING CENTRAL...MOSTLY CLOUDY FAR SOUTH. LOWS FROM THE UPPER 20S FAR NORTHWEST TO NEAR 40 FAR SOUTH. WEDNESDAY...MOSTLY CLOUDY NORTHEAST...PARTLY SUNNY ELSEWHERE. HIGHS NEAR 40 NORTH...45 TO 50 CENTRAL AND NEAR 60 FAR SOUTH. WEDNESDAY NIGHT...PARTLY CLOUDY. LOWS IN THE 20S NORTH TO 30S SOUTH. THURSDAY...PARTLY OR MOSTLY SUNNY. HIGHS FROM NEAR 40 NORTH TO THE 5OS SOUTH. EXTENDED FORECAST... FRIDAY THROUGH SUNDAY...DRY WITH A SLOW WARMING TREND. LOWS FROM THE 20S NORTH TO 30S SOUTH FRIDAY...WARMING TO THE 30S NORTH TO 40S SOUTH SUNDAY. HIGHS FROM THE 40S NORTH TO 50S SOUTH FRIDAY...GRADUALLY WARMING TO THE MIDDLE 50S NORTH TO LOWER 60S SOUTH BY SUNDAY.

1 - Given a blank page, and without changing the font size, lay out this text on the page in a better format

2 - Given another blank page, and starting from the original paragraph above, and given the ability to change the font size, lay out this text on the page in a better format

(compare this kind of formatting to what you expect to see in a restaurant menu)


last updated 2/20/2008