Post Test Question 1 Analysis

 

The students’ post test results were broken up into one or more of the following categories:  marking each mushroom with a flag, searching the area by ground type, using the map to cover the entire area, using care to obtain an accurate mushroom count, and using a visual sweep of an area.

 

75% of the students mentioned using the biodegradable flags to indicate that a mushroom had been counted already.  This percentage indicates that the students realized that some sort of organization must be utilized to obtain an accurate count.  The size of the area and amount of mushrooms emphasized the importance of a non-random search.

 

Almost half of the student wrote that they would search by ground type.  Searching by ground type broke the large area into smaller, more workable units that the students were able to see clearly from one end to another.  Since the entirety of the field was relatively small compared to the potential capacity of the field (the field exercise used 1/9 of the field application’s size), the ground types might not be so effective in a larger area.  Considerations must also be taken for the field being broken up into three ground types, each type occurring once in the field.  If the ground types were scattered across the field in multiple patches, searching by ground types might also prove to produce different results.

 

As one of the students wrote: “Since the computer had a map you could make sure that there was a (dot) in every part of the field.”  Only two students mentioned using the map, both being in a trace treatment group.  Since only trace treatment students wrote about or drew pictures of the trace and map, one might guess that only this treatment actually aided the students in their field traversals.

 

Half of the students used meticulous counting as part of their strategy to obtain an accurate count.  This method was not included in the pre- or post-discussions, so the students were exercising their common sense.

 

Finally, a few students wrote about using a visual sweep of an area to add accuracy to their counts.  A visual sweep is standing in one area and turning 360 degrees in either direction, eyeballing the area for any missed mushrooms.  All the students that wrote about using this method also wrote about using flags to mark counted mushrooms, which allows the sweep to be performed.  If a mushroom does not have a flag when the student is “turning”, they will mark it (as observed from the field performances).  One student mentioned executing a sweep after counting and flagging mushrooms in each area, which might only be effective for these smaller ground type areas.

 

Lastly, a few of the student wrote responses to question one that had no pertinence to the discussion.  One of these students did not actually participate in the study, but the other two students that did not participate wrote answers that reflected some gained knowledge of traversal strategies through the pre- and post-discussions.